![]() ![]() "These findings suggest that ordinary people are generally attentive to each communication modality when tasked to discern real from fake and have a relatively keen sense for what the two most recent US presidents sound like," they wrote. People are less likely to be tricked into believing falsehoods if they have more information available to them, the researchers concluded. Facebook won't nuke deepfakes? OK, let's tear up those precious legal protections from user-posted content, then.Who will save us from deepfakes? Other AIs? Humans? What about vastly hyperintelligent pandimensional beings?.US Senate approves deepfake bill to defend against manipulated media.Facebook, academics think they've cracked spotting deepfakes by spotting how they're generated. ![]() This might be more of a test of the voice actors' abilities, but what do we know? All in all, they were able to identify whether something was fake or not about 57 per cent of the time for text, compared to 76 per cent for just audio and 82 per cent for videos with audio. To make sure the results weren't skewed by political orientation, about half of the group were Democrats, while the other half were Republicans.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |